Paid QOA
Test the decision, available history, authority to act and value at stake.
From first assessment to a working engine
Fable tests the opportunity before building, proves the engine against an agreed baseline, deploys it inside the client boundary and remains responsible for its performance.
Four stages, with a decision at the end of each.
Proceed, change the scope or stop. The evidence—not sunk cost—determines whether the work advances.
Pilot
Run the engine against an agreed baseline using the client’s operating record.
Production
Deploy the approved models, workflow, integrations and fallback.
Stewardship
Monitor performance, retrain when evidence warrants it and account for results.
01 · PAID QOA
First establish whether the opportunity is real.
The QOA identifies the recurring decision, who owns it, what evidence existed at the time, which actions the organisation controls and how a better result would be measured.
| Decision | A repeated operating choice with a named owner and a material consequence. |
| Evidence | Historical records that can be joined as they existed before the outcome was known. |
| Output | A recommendation to proceed, change scope or stop, with the pilot and commercial case if it proceeds. |
Compare the engine with current practice
Map client records, fit and calibrate the candidate models, freeze the baseline and test whether the engine improves the agreed decision.
Deploy the approved decision path
Put the selected models, fallback, operator workflow, integrations and measurement into the client environment.
Keep the engine fit for use
Monitor data, model performance, policy, completion and outcomes. Retrain or recalibrate when the evidence justifies a change.
What is already built—and what must be fitted to the client.
| Fable product | Client implementation |
|---|---|
| The decision model, forecasts, action types, constraints, optimisation, value method and operator workflow. | Source access, field mapping, historical records, owners, permissions and integrations. |
| A selected reference model, versioned artifact handling and a deterministic fallback. | A client-calibrated model, shadow evaluation, approval and production limits. |
| Contracts for recording decisions, actions, outcomes and financial value. | The agreed baseline, observed results, finance review and rollout. |
Is the decision worth a paid assessment?
Tell us how it is made today, which records support it and what a better result would be worth.
Discuss the decision